This would be mad cool to watch, what do you think Weedman? (buddy of mine showed this to me)
Here's Betelgeuse. It's a star. A really big, prominent one. If you go outside and take a look at the constellation Orion, it's his right shoulder.
That might not look like much, but it is. There are only about a dozen stars in the universe that can be imaged as a disc, instead of a point, on even the largest telescopes. We can see sunspots on it. This star is staggeringly enormous, it's about 1000 times the diameter of the sun. If you took Betelgeuse and overlaid it on the Sun, the outer edge of the star would be somewhere out by the orbit of Saturn. It is the ninth-largest star in the entire universe
It's also old. Not in absolute terms, it's only about 8.5 million years old. But in terms of stellar lifetimes, it's a doddering old fart. It's a red supergiant and is way off the main sequence. That means that it's already burned up its supply of hydrogen, and is currently burning helium and heavier elements, working its way up to iron. And when stars start accumulating iron in their cores, they're not long for this universe; the fusion of iron is endothermic, so once iron starts building up there's no more internal outward pressure to counter gravitational collapse, and when that happens we get a nice big Type II supernova, with a neutron star or black hole left over. Beltelguese
It's been suspected for a while that Betelguese is an excellent candidate for a supernova at some time within the next few thousand years. Supergiants don't last long, because they're so huge. More graviational pressure means the fusion reaction runs at a higher rate, so the most massive supergiants can burn through their hydrogen in under a million years. So 8.5 million years is pretty old for a supergiant. And Betelgeuse has been *shrinking*, which is a death throe. It's been shrinking, in fact, since 1993; in June of last year, it was only 85% as big as it was back then. And the rate of shrink has been accelerating.
Well, now there's a new rumor, supposedly from the Mauna Kea observatory, that the rate of shrinkage has gotten so fast that the star isn't round anymore. Since a star spins, conservation of angular momentum means that when it undergoes gravitational collapse, it'll happen faster along the polar axis than along an equatorial one. But it would have to be *very* fast for this to show up as a distinct oblateness.
If this rumor is true, then it's likely that that timeframe changes from "within the next few thousand years" to "within the next few months. Or weeks." You could walk outside tonight and see a star in the very final stages of still being a star (well, if you're in the right hemisphere). And if it blows, it will be spectacular; the best-observed supernova in history occurred back in 1054, and that one was visible, *in broad daylight*, for 23 days, and visible at night for about two years. And that star was 6300 light years away, not 600. At the very outside, this could be twice as bright as a full moon.
Don't worry, it's too far away to hurt anything. But man, would that be incredible to witness.
(copy-pasted from SA)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks






Reply With Quote

at least Betelgeuse






Bookmarks